Johannesburg’s water crisis got the parliamentary treatment on Wednesday. National oversight officials descended on the metro to scrutinize promised improvements. They also questioned the city’s troubling funding decisions.
Executive Mayor Dada Morero hosted the Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation. The full-day inspection examined infrastructure projects across the city. But this was no courtesy visit.
It follows an urgent September meeting with serious allegations. MPs raised concerns about the city’s “inadequate response” to persistent shortages. They also criticized the controversial defunding of Johannesburg Water.
That defunding is directly hampering infrastructure development, according to Parliament. The city now had to answer for it in person.
Led by MP LJ Basson, the committee didn’t accept promises at face value. They conducted on-site inspections of key projects. These are projects Joburg claims will stabilize its faltering water supply.
What’s under the microscope:
The Crosby Reservoir construction, meant to address chronic shortages in Westbury. The Brixton Reservoir upgrade – long overdue improvements to boost storage. Water tanker depots that have become a permanent fixture for residents. The Zuikerbosch Treatment Plant and Vaal River projects are also under review. So is the Germiston Acid Mine Drainage site.
All involve critical infrastructure led by Rand Water and the city.
The oversight visit carries presidential weight. President Cyril Ramaphosa identified quality water services as essential for development. Parliament’s message is clear: they’re monitoring whether Joburg delivers or just talks.
“We welcome the Committee’s oversight and guidance,” Morero said. He acknowledged the need for accountability as the turnaround strategy continues.
The reality? Parliament is watching closely. Johannesburg’s water problems have persisted for years. Thousands of residents and businesses remain affected.
With funding questions now on the table alongside infrastructure delays, answers are needed. The committee wants tangible responses – not just more presentations.